What's more fuel efficient, orbit or slingshot?

What's more fuel efficient, orbit or slingshot? - Rocket launch from spaceport on cloudy day

I didn't test it because I just had that idea. Normally, I (maybe everyone?) would send the ship to orbit Kerbin and then plan the trajectory to the final destination.

Making the spaceship to orbit Kerbin will consume more fuel than sending the ship straight ahead to escape Kerbin gravitational influence.

Taking that in consideration, if I use the Mum and/or Minmus (and even other planets) to slingshot me to the final destination, would it be more fuel efficient or the gain is negligible?



Best Answer

Scott Manley has a couple of videos where he explains this. Taking advantage of the Oberth Effect for a gravity assist can help you in some cases. But for others it may not worth the trouble.

The most fuel efficient way to attain a desired orbit is to only burn at periapsis (lowest point in your orbit), because at periapsis the gravity of the body you are orbiting helps to max out your speed. If time is not a factor, you can wait while your craft orbits to an optimal position just prior to periapsis, and then burn until you are a little ways past it.

When getting into orbit on a launch from Kerbin, you don't have that luxury. In fact, you're pretty much being forced to burn at apoapsis (highest point in your orbit) when gravity is actually working its hardest against you.

As for slingshotting around the Mun, Scott Manley demonstrates that in this video (Mun slingshot starts at about 4:08):

Here he tries to establish a transfer orbit to Jool, and actually spends more fuel while slingshotting around the Mun vs. a direct burn. Now you might have better luck if you wait for the Mun to line up just right, so you could try experimenting with that.

On the other hand, in this video he demonstrates slingshotting around Jool to get a return trajectory to Kerbin (10:30):

The big difference here is the gravity of Jool is much greater than that of the Mun's, so it has an easier time influencing and helping your transfer orbit.

Now, just because Scott Manley tried it and couldn't make the Mun slingshot yield high rewards doesn't mean it can't be done. Give it a try and see. But even if you can make it work, you probably won't save enough fuel to make it worth the effort.




Pictures about "What's more fuel efficient, orbit or slingshot?"

What's more fuel efficient, orbit or slingshot? - Lunar Eclipse
What's more fuel efficient, orbit or slingshot? - Full Moon
What's more fuel efficient, orbit or slingshot? - Burning Stove



What is the most fuel efficient way to do interplanetary travel?

Ion engines and mirrors would be the most efficient propulsion method as well, however I would recommend using common LOXY engines to get into orbit, and then the ion engines to break orbit and head towards the sun. It would work, if you were to launch your rocket today, along the orbital path of the planets...

Can you slingshot around the sun?

Interplanetary slingshots using the Sun itself are not possible because the Sun is at rest relative to the Solar System as a whole.

Can you slingshot around the moon?

But when it gets to the Moon, the Moon is the closest body so its gravity will have the strongest effect on the spacecraft. If it flies past close enough and stays flying fast enough that it can't be captured by the body to start orbiting it, that spacecraft will slingshot around.



Rnbstylerz \u0026 AREES - WHAT




More answers regarding what's more fuel efficient, orbit or slingshot?

Answer 2

Using a gravity-assist around Mun can give you quite a lot of additional delta-v for free. Minmus not so much, because its gravity is so low and it is so hard to hit.

However, gravity assists are much less precise than just doing a single burn. Especially when you want to perform more than one. Also keep in mind that they take time to set up, so when you are going for an interplanetary transfer, you might have trouble meeting your launch window. That means a mission with gravity assists takes a lot more time to plan, and a lot of fiddling with maneuver nodes and minuscule in-flight course corrections. Figuring out a way to get more fuel into orbit can sometimes be a much less time-consuming task.

Sources: Stack Exchange - This article follows the attribution requirements of Stack Exchange and is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.

Images: SpaceX, Johannes Plenio, SevenStorm JUHASZIMRUS, Pixabay