Lore reason behind dissolving of the corpses in Dark Souls

Lore reason behind dissolving of the corpses in Dark Souls - Person in Black Leather Jacket Standing Behind Red Theater Seat

Some enemies, after you kill them, leave a corpse behind, some just dissolve in the air and leave nothing. First I thought it is because of their size, but it is not size dependent, for example slimes dissolve as well as giants. So I wonder are there any lore reasons behind some enemies not having corpses?

P.S. Note, The Ashen One also disappears after death leaving no corpse behind.



Best Answer

Well I can start by saying that there is some sort of Lore Reason and there is not (Please take this with a grain of salt. Not everything in Dark Souls games is related to the Lore).

But I will say that believing there is an actual Lore Reason depends on you and how much you read into the game's Lore. For my honest belief read the Not so Lore Reason part of the question

1. Lore Reason

In Dark Souls there wasn't many vanishing corpses of enemies. But there were some. The Lore reason for this is that some of them (enemies or not) were conjured illusions. They were not there physically per say but they were there as an illusion. So basically when you killed them they would simply vanish.

2. Not so Lore Reason

Some enemys have a vanishing effect such as demons.. other enemies stay there until you move far enough away/stop looking at them. It doesn't matter because in the end all enemies need to be culled for performance reasons.

The only reason Dark Souls 1 didn't do that was literally because it was a bad/lazy design choice. In the world of game development, the idea of leaving corpses everywhere is considered bad design because they serve almost no purpose and cause a massive dent in performance and loss of memory.

So, regarding performance and smoothness, small enemies with small bodies would not be so bad to keep the bodies around for a little bit. But really big enemies might slow down the game a bit. So, by design, they make them vanish to keep the game flowing well.

[UPDATE]

Why not add some small placeholders for these enemies? (comment by @NamikazeSheena)

Well that is a good question but it all comes down to Game Design and compromises for performance sake.

Let us compare enemies in Dark Souls 3 for example (the most recent entry)

  • Lothric Knight: Not that big. Semi-Complex textures. The engine handles them well. So basically their bodies can be left for a little while (if you remain within their draw range)
  • Fire-Breathing Dragon: Huge. Big Textures. Already slows frames per second down when on-screen. Performance wise it is NOT viable to have all these bodies just around.

When you distance yourself quite a bit from the bodies. Some memory can be released to draw the new areas and present new stuff. Thus, old stuff must go.

People tend to overthink Dark Souls lore in general and read to deep into it. In this case right here most of it is just plain performance and game design compromises.




Pictures about "Lore reason behind dissolving of the corpses in Dark Souls"

Lore reason behind dissolving of the corpses in Dark Souls - Black Flat Screen Computer Monitor
Lore reason behind dissolving of the corpses in Dark Souls - Woods Covered With Snow
Lore reason behind dissolving of the corpses in Dark Souls - Man Wearing Black Fitted Cap



What is the lore behind dark souls?

The world of Dark Souls is a world of cycles. Kingdoms rise and fall, ages come and go, and even time can end and restart as the flame fades and is renewed. These cycles are linked to the First Flame, a mysterious manifestation of life that divides and defines separate states such as heat and cold, or life and death.

Why is everyone dead in Dark Souls?

It isn't known what caused people to be Undead, but it happened to almost everyone regardless of who they were. The mark of the Undead is the Darksign, proof the curse has taken hold. An Undead doesn't die in human terms. When they are 'killed', they resurrect at a bonfire.

Why do enemies disappear in ds2?

Unlike in previous games, enemies in Dark Souls II all have a set number of times that they can respawn. Once an enemy is defeated a certain number of times, they will not respawn unless a NG+ cycle is started, or a Bonfire Ascetic is burned in the area's bonfire.

Is everything dead in Dark Souls?

Though the endings available in Dark Souls 1 allow you to end the curse, the subsequent games are based on the grim outcome. Everything is dead because at some point, it actually died. The curse results in undeath. In a report via VG247, FromSoftware has confirmed that the Dark Souls franchise has died.



Dark Souls Lore ► Explained!




More answers regarding lore reason behind dissolving of the corpses in Dark Souls

Answer 2

To expand on Lokuzt's answer, particularly following the statement:

People tend to overthink Dark Souls lore in general and read to deep into it.

Remember, this is a video game. Not every mechanic in the game needs a "lore reason".

For example; Bosses. Imagine if the bosses left a corpse upon death, or the dragons. You'd be dealing with a giant gargoyle corpse flopping about the Undead Burg, blocking your way, and getting jammed up in corridors. Talk about killing the immersion.

And then, as Lokuzt covered, there's the issue of memory. Running a game smoothly does require a certain amount of memory. If there are too many moving parts (cough blighttown cough) the game performance will begin to suffer.

An extreme example of this was a story I heard of a player that wanted to investigate a duplication glitch in their game (not Dark Souls obviously). They duped about 1000 watermelons, then once they had their fun, dumped them out of their inventory (as the items were effectively glitched, and unusable in game). Big mistake. The area became known as a dead zone in his game, as any time he came close enough to the area, the game began to lag at an extreme rate, due to the physics engine trying to load all of these objects at once.

Sources: Stack Exchange - This article follows the attribution requirements of Stack Exchange and is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.

Images: Tima Miroshnichenko, Alena Darmel, Mikhail Nilov, Kyle Loftus