Is there a consequence to assign a general to an other army stacks?

Is there a consequence to assign a general to an other army stacks? - Colonel in Uniform Giving a Speech

I'm doing two wars at the same time. Battlefields are far one from the other.

I was asking me if there is a malus or a consequence to switch a general from an army stack to an other (that is really far) many time in a short laps of time ?

I've read on the net (on an unofficial source) that the general will fight as usual, but will be likely to die sooner than expected. Is it right? In this case, I might choose to buy an other general instead of exhausting a really good one.

EDIT : I know right there is a risk each time he's fighting to die during the battle. But otherwise, is there other factors that can make him die younger than expected.



Best Answer

I have not experienced the behavior you are referring to. Switching generals is generally a good idea if you can afford it (strategy-wise). I've done it in virtually every war I've fought, and it saved me a lot of troubles. Your generals will always have a chance to die in every fight they are part of anyway.




Pictures about "Is there a consequence to assign a general to an other army stacks?"

Is there a consequence to assign a general to an other army stacks? - Diverse little classmates speaking near whiteboard during lesson at school
Is there a consequence to assign a general to an other army stacks? - Crop military ethnic females stacking hands
Is there a consequence to assign a general to an other army stacks? -





The Five Star Rank and Officers




Sources: Stack Exchange - This article follows the attribution requirements of Stack Exchange and is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.

Images: Antonio Prado, Katerina Holmes, Alfin Auzikri, RONROV photographer